. . . ,^ . . . . dlrectlons ot ratlona lty; eplstemo Oglcally, Weber's neo-Kantian assumptions implied a value-related diagnostic concern with modern occidental culture. Hence, for Schluchter, Weber's work develops neither a comparative structural analysis of world history, nor a universal theory of evolution; rather, it is a 'societal history' of the West. To demonstrate and clarify this 'developmental-historical' approach, Schluchter devotes the bulk of the book to
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Conway et al. (1980) studied this question.