Why the study?
Do new P2Y12 receptor antagonists (prasugrel, cangrelor, AZD6140) improve clinical outcomes and safety in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Do new P2Y12 receptor antagonists (prasugrel, cangrelor, AZD6140) improve clinical outcomes and safety in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
This review highlights the clinical development of new P2Y12 receptor antagonists (prasugrel, cangrelor, AZD6140) that aim to improve ischemic outcomes in ACS patients compared to clopidogrel.
May inform P2Y12 inhibitor choice in ACS PCI despite bleeding trade-off; leaves open optimal net benefit for newer agents.
Platelets play an important role in thrombus formation. A number of new antiplatelet agents currently in development are anticipated to improve clinical outcomes and safety benefits in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This manuscript reviews the pharmacology and clinical development of three of these agents: prasugrel, cangrelor, and AZD6140. Prasugrel, a third-generation, oral thienopyridine, has been shown to be superior to clopidogrel, the current gold standard, in preventing ischaemic events in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), although the bleeding rate was higher. Cangrelor, a chemical analogue of adenosine triphosphate, is a potent direct platelet P2Y12 antagonist. In development as an intravenous agent, cangrelor is currently being evaluated in two phase III studies in patients requiring PCI. AZD6140 is the first of a novel new class of antiplatelet agents that inhibits adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation at the level of the P2Y12 receptor. AZD6140 was shown to have a good safety profile in phase II studies and is currently being studied in a phase III trial in patients with ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marco Cattaneo (2008) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS). New P2Y12 receptor antagonists (prasugrel, cangrelor, AZD6140) vs. clopidogrel was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: