Key result
The Robotic One Anesthetic Diagnosis and Treatment (ROADAT) program reduced the time from lung nodule detection to surgical resection compared with standard workup (82 vs 117 days; P=0.001).
Why the study?
Early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer improve outcomes, prompting the evaluation of a single-setting robotic program to reduce delays between diagnosis and treatment.
Does a Robotic One Anesthetic Diagnosis and Treatment (ROADAT) program reduce time to resection and costs compared to standard workup in patients with lung nodules?
Cohort (n=71)
Does a Robotic One Anesthetic Diagnosis and Treatment (ROADAT) program reduce time to resection and costs compared to standard workup in patients with lung nodules?
A combined robotic diagnosis and surgical resection program for lung nodules significantly reduces time to treatment and overall costs compared to standard sequential care.
Background Early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer can improve patient outcomes. To reduce the delay between diagnosis and treatment, we initiated a Robotic One Anesthetic Diagnosis and Treatment (ROADAT) program for lung nodules that combined robotic navigational bronchoscopy, liquid rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), and surgical resection in the same setting. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent the ROADAT procedure from December 1, 2021, through January 31, 2024. These patients were compared with sequential controls from the same time window, who would have been ROADAT candidates but underwent diagnosis and treatment using a standard lung nodule workup. Results There were 36 patients in the ROADAT group and 35 controls. Of the 36 ROADAT patients, 31 (86%) underwent lung resections. When final pathology was available, ROSE was concordant in 91% (29 of 32) of cases. Compared with robotic lobectomies alone, ROADAT procedures that resulted in lobectomies added 73 minutes ( P = .003). However, total operating room time for when lobectomy and biopsy were done in separate settings was 54 minutes shorter in the ROADAT group ( P = .028). Direct (ROADAT, $19,244; controls, $21,737; P = .004) procedure costs and total (ROADAT, $26,668; controls, $29,882; P = .005) procedure costs were lower in the ROADAT group for patients who underwent lobectomy. Time from detection to resection was 35 days shorter in the ROADAT group (ROADAT, 82 days; controls, 117 days; P = .001). Conclusions The ROADAT procedure reduced time from nodule detection to surgical resection compared with the standard approach. Liquid-based ROSE had high concordance with final pathology. Total operative time, direct costs, and total costs were lower for the ROADAT procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palleiko et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Lung nodules (n=71). Robotic One Anesthetic Diagnosis and Treatment (ROADAT) vs. Standard lung nodule workup was evaluated on Time from detection to resection (p=0.001). The Robotic One Anesthetic Diagnosis and Treatment (ROADAT) program reduced the time from lung nodule detection to surgical resection compared with standard workup (82 vs 117 days; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: