When the Arrhenius equation is applied to microbial growth rates, a temperature characteristic (μA) represents the activation energy. While these μA values describe the energetics favouring growth, there is still no convincing evidence from empirical data to support the idea of a widely applicable relationship between μA values and optimal growth temperatures, which may serve as a basis for the classification of psychrophiles, psychrotrophs, mesophiles and thermophiles. The μA values for the exponential growth rates of 16 psychrophilic and psychrotrophic bacterial strains, including 9 from the literature, varied from 3 to 33 (kcal mol−1). A plot of μA versus growth temperature optimum deviated considerably from empirical equations reported recently ( Mohr & Krawiec, 1980 ) for a different selection of strains. Moreover, Arrhenius profiles with two distinct slopes at suboptimal temperatures were not restricted to bacteria with growth temperature optima higher than 37 °C, as had been suggested in that report. A psychrotrophic strain of Cytophaga johnsonae with a growth temperature optimum of 23–25 °C was characterized by two different temperature characteristics. Furthermore, in the upper range of suboptimal temperatures (11–24 °C), temperature characteristics (μA1) were also affected by temperature acclimation of the inoculum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reichardt et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: