Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To examine the effect of shear stress on hydraulic conductivity (Lp) of bovine aortic endothelial cell monolayers grown on polycarbonate filters, we developed a rotating disk system, which imposed a defined shear stress while Lp was measured. A 10-cmH2O pressure differential was applied to monolayers, and baseline Lp was established between 1.65 +/- 0.85 and 4.94 +/- 1.05 x 10(-7) cm.s-1.cmH2O-1. One-hour exposure to 10 dyn/cm2 shear stress caused a significant (P < 0.05) increase in Lp by 2.16-fold (+/- 0.42), and Lp remained elevated when shear stress was removed. Three-hour exposure to shear stresses between 0.1 and 20.0 dyn/cm2 revealed a threshold for shear-induced increase in Lp of 0.5 dyn/cm2. At 20 dyn/cm2, Lp initially decreased by 30% (+/- 13.4%, P < 0.05) and then increased to a level 3.76-fold (+/- 0.83, P < 0.05) greater than baseline Lp at 3 h. The shear-induced increase in Lp was reversed with dibutyryl adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (DBcAMP, 1 mM) and could be significantly (P < 0.05) inhibited when monolayers were preincubated with 0.3 mM DBcAMP, a concentration that did not significantly affect baseline Lp. Furthermore, preincubation with a general phosphodiesterase inhibitor, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (1 mM), completely blocked the shear-induced increase in Lp. On the basis of these results, we conclude that shear stress alters endothelial Lp through a cellular mechanism involving signal transduction, not by a purely physical mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sill et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: