Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: This study assessed the pharmacodynamic activity of ertapenem against multidrug-resistant (MDR) genotypically characterized extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli using an in vitro model. METHODS: Six ESBL-producing E. coli with the CTX-M-15 genotype were studied. All six strains were MDR (defined as resistance to third-generation cephalosporins and > or = two other unrelated antimicrobial classes). The in vitro pharmacodynamic model was inoculated with 1 x 10(6) cfu/mL, and ertapenem was dosed once daily at 0 and 24 h to simulate free (f) Cmax and t(1/2) obtained after a standard 1 g intravenous once-daily dose in healthy volunteers (fCmax, 15 mg/L; t(1/2), 4 h). Sampling was performed over 48 h to assess viable growth and resistance selection. RESULTS: Ertapenem T(>MIC) > or = 98% (ertapenem MICs < or = 0.25 mg/L) resulted in bactericidal (> or = 3 log(10) killing) activity at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h against all strains. Eradication of organisms from the in vitro model (below the level of detection) occurred at 2 h followed by slow regrowth of the majority of the strains (5 of 6) over 12, 24 and 48 h time points. Despite limited regrowth, ertapenem achieved a bactericidal effect against all strains (all time points) over the 48 h study period. CONCLUSIONS: Ertapenem was rapidly bactericidal (in approximately 2 h) against MDR ESBL (CTX-M-15)-producing E. coli (ertapenem MICs < or = 0.25 mg/L) when simulating free drug after 1 g intravenous once-daily dosing. This bactericidal activity was maintained over the 48 h experimental period with only minor regrowth, which was not associated with MIC increase from baseline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhanel et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: