Key result
Different profiles of chronic disease resource utilization among patients with coronary heart disease were significantly associated with quality of life (R2 = 0.126, p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Profiles of chronic disease resource utilization among patients with coronary heart disease in Tibet and their relationship with quality of life needed to be identified and explored.
Does chronic disease resource utilization profile affect quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=382)
Yes
Does chronic disease resource utilization profile affect quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease?
Different profiles of chronic disease resource utilization are significantly associated with quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease, suggesting targeted interventions could improve patient outcomes.
Profiles of resource utilization were associated with QoL; leaves open whether targeted strategies improve outcomes in Tibetan CHD patients.
Aims This study aimed to identify different profiles of chronic disease resource utilization among patients with coronary heart disease in Tibet and explore the relationship between these profiles and quality of life. Design A cross‐sectional study. Methods Patients with coronary heart disease who were treated in a tertiary hospital in Tibet and its cooperative points from January 2021 to July 2021 were selected as the study participants. All participants completed a general information questionnaire, the Chronic Disease Resource Utilization Questionnaire (CIRS) and the Health Status Survey Short Form (SF‐36). Chronic disease resource utilization was profiled, and its relationship to quality of life was explored using hierarchical linear regression. Results A total of 382 patients were enrolled in this study. Regarding chronic disease resource utilization, the participants were divided into three latent profiles: ‘Poor utilization group’ ( n = 151), ‘Effective utilization group’ ( n = 155) and ‘Full utilization group’ ( n = 76). Different profiles of chronic disease resource utilization of patients were significantly associated with quality of life ( R 2 = .126, p < .001). Conclusion Healthcare providers should identify patients with different profiles, define their utilization features of chronic disease resources and adopt targeted interventions to guide them in acquiring enough disease support resources to improve their quality of life. Implication Understanding different resources using preferences of coronary heart disease patients can help healthcare providers and related sectors to provide other supports based on different profiles of patients, thus enhancing their quality of life. Reporting Method The study followed the STROBE guideline. No Patient or Public Contribution There was no patient or public involvement in the design of the study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in coronary heart disease (n=382). Chronic disease resource utilization profiles was evaluated on quality of life (R2 = 0.126, p=<0.001). Different profiles of chronic disease resource utilization among patients with coronary heart disease were significantly associated with quality of life (R2 = 0.126, p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: