Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to compare the cartilage of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed and uninjured contralateral knees using T 1ρ MRI 12-16 months after ACL reconstructions. METHODS: Eighteen patients with ACL-reconstructed knees (10 women, 8 men, mean age = 38.3 ± 7.8 years) were studied using 3T MRI. Injured and contralateral knee MR studies were acquired 12-16 months post-operatively. Cartilage sub-compartment T 1ρ values of each injured knee were compared with the contralateral knee's values. Subgroup analysis of sub-compartment T 1ρ values in both knees was performed between patients with and without meniscal tears at the time of ACL reconstruction using a paired Student's t test. RESULTS: In ACL-injured knees, the T 1ρ values of the medial tibia (MT) and medial femoral condyle (MFC) were significantly elevated at 12-16 months follow-up compared to contralateral knees. Patients with a medial meniscal tear had higher MFC and MT T 1ρ values compared to respective regions in contralateral knees. Patients with lateral meniscal tears had higher lateral femoral condyle and LT T 1ρ values compared to respective regions in contralateral knees. There were no differences between the injured and contralateral knees of patients without meniscal tears. CONCLUSIONS: T 1ρ MRI can detect significant changes in the medial compartments' cartilage matrix of ACL-reconstructed knees at 1 year post-operatively compared to contralateral knees. The presence of a meniscal tear at the time of ACL reconstruction is a risk factor for cartilage matrix degeneration in the femorotibial compartments on the same side as the meniscal tear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Theologis et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: