The potential of a bioactive bone cement (BABC) as an onlay graft material for the mandible with and without the periosteum was investigated in rabbits. Its matrix consists of bisphenol-alpha-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) and triethylene-glycol dimetacrylate (TEGDMA) and its filler is silane-treated CaO-SiO2-P2O5-MgO-CaF2 glass (A-W glass-ceramic) powder. The BABC was pasted onto the mandible under the periosteum in Group 1, and onto the mandible with the periosteum removed in Group 2 and allowed to set in situ. In both groups, the cement-bone interface was filled by new bone at 4, 12 and 48 weeks, and bone grew from adjacent bone tissue into the cement-soft tissue interface at 12 and 48 weeks. There were no differences in the rate of bone formation between the groups. The shearing strength increased progressively from 0.25+/-0.10 MPa (mean+/-SD) at week 1 to 7.98+/-0.62 MPa at week 48. The results suggest that the BABC has good handling properties, a high bonding strength and good biocompatibility, and that it has potential for clinical application as a substitute material for autogenous bone transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujimura et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: