Ultrastructure of the interface between bioactive composite and bone: Comparison of apatite and wollastonite containing glass-ceramic filler with hydroxyapatite and ?-tricalcium phosphate fillers

We have developed a bioactive bone cement that consists of apatite and wollastonite containing glass-ceramic (AW-GC) powder and bisphenol-a-glycidyl dimethacrylate (Bis-GMA)-based resin. In this study, we made three types of composite (designated AWC, HAC, and TCPC) consisting of AW-GC, hydroxyapatite (HA,) or beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) powder as the inorganic filler and Bis-GMA-based resin as the organic matrix. The proportion by weight of the filler mixed into the cement was 70%. Rectangular plates (10 x 15 x 2 mm) of each composite were made and abraded with 2000 alumina powder. These composites were implanted into tibial metaphyses of rabbits. Specimens were prepared 10 and 25 weeks after implantation and examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). AWC was in direct contact with bone 10 weeks after implantation, and AW-GC particles were partially absorbed at the surface. HAC was in contact with partially mineralized extracellular matrix 10 weeks after implantation. In TCPC-implanted specimens, randomly oriented mineral was observed 10 weeks after implantation; however, collagenous extracellular matrix rarely was observed. In 25-week specimens, AW-GC particles were completely absorbed and replaced by new bone, and there was no intervening soft tissue. Both HAC and TCPC were in contact with bone at 25 weeks. These results indicate that AWC has higher bioactivity than either HAC or TCPC.