Why the study?
High-load resistance training required to induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy is not always feasible for clinical populations and recovering athletes due to rheumatic limitations.
Blood flow restriction training offers a viable alternative to heavy resistance training for inducing skeletal muscle hypertrophy in patients recovering from musculoskeletal injuries who cannot tolerate high mechanical tension.
Metabolic stress may enable hypertrophy at lower loads in load-limited patients; hypothesis-generating for clinical and athletic recovery.
Skeletal muscle loss poses significant health issues to both the general clinical population, but also athletes recovering from musculoskeletal (MSK) injury. Whilst resistance training is known to induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy (SMH), 70% of an individual’s one repetition maximum (1RM) is required to elicit such changes. This is not always feasible for the abovementioned populations due to rheumatic limitations and thus, targeting metabolic stress as a stimulus for skeletal muscle hypertrophy may be more favourable than that of mechanical tension. Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training occludes venous out-flow, whilst sustaining arterial in-flow to the working muscle resulting in a pooling of anaerobic metabolites. As a result, resistance training loads as low as 20% 1RM are capable of eliciting hypertrophic effects equivalent to training at heavier loads, and this is mediated through both endocrine and intramuscular mechanisms. Safe administration of BFR is paramount, especially when prescribing to post-surgical athletes. As such, the coach or clinician in question must take careful consideration regarding pressure application, rest periods and various patient characteristics such as post-surgical timeframe and overall health status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Bower (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: