Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The formation of many oxides with unpredictable structures can be attributed to a balance between stable and unstable compositions. A surprising number of the members of the Ln 4 Cu 3 MoO 12 and Ln‘ 2 Ln‘ ‘ 2 Cu 3 MoO 12 (Ln = La−Nd, Sm−Lu) families form, all crystallizing in a hexagonal structure similar to that of YMnO 3 . Some do not form because either the average lanthanide size is too small ( r̄ Ln < 105 pm, where r Ln ≡ 9-coordinate trivalent lanthanide radii) or the difference between the size of Ln‘ and Ln‘ ‘ is too large (Δ r Ln > 14 pm). Furthermore, even if Ln‘ 4 Cu 3 MoO 12 and Ln‘ ‘ 4 Cu 3 MoO 12 form single phases, attempts to synthesize the corresponding solution phase, Ln‘ 2 Ln‘ ‘ 2 Cu 3 MoO 12, may result in a mixture of simpler metal oxides. The explanation illuminates the importance of unstable “umbrella” stoichiometries for the formation of unconventional structures in multication systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Griend et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: