Why the study?
What are the barriers to optimal stroke prevention for atrial fibrillation among clinicians in the US Stroke Belt?
What are the barriers to optimal stroke prevention for atrial fibrillation among clinicians in the US Stroke Belt?
Addressing implicit bias, medical mistrust, and cultural competency among clinicians may help reduce racial disparities in AF-related stroke prevention.
Highlights modifiable barriers in AF care; hypothesis-generating for interventions targeting racial disparities in stroke prevention.
Disparities in atrial fibrillation (AF)-related stroke and mortality persist, especially racial disparities, within the US "Stroke Belt." This study identified barriers to optimal stroke prevention to develop a framework for clinician education. A comprehensive educational needs assessment was developed focusing on clinicians within the Stroke Belt. The mixed qualitative-quantitative approach included regional surveys and one-on-one clinician interviews. Identified contributors to disparities included implicit racial biases, lack of awareness of racial disparities in AF stroke risk, and lack of effective multicultural awareness and training. Additional barriers affecting disparities included patient medical mistrust and clinician-patient communication challenges. General barriers included lack of consistency in assessing stroke and anticoagulant-related bleeding risk, underuse of standardized risk assessment tools, discomfort with novel anticoagulants, and patient education deficiencies. Effective cultural competency training is one strategy to reduce disparities in AF-related stroke and mortality by improving implicit clinician bias, addressing medical mistrust, and improving clinician-patient communication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karcher et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: