Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review explores integration strategies for 3D-on-2D heterostructures in electronics, suggesting future innovations.
Two-dimensional (2D) materials have garnered significant attention due to their exceptional properties requisite for next-generation electronics, including ultrahigh carrier mobility, superior mechanical flexibility, and unusual optical characteristics. Despite their great potential, one of the major technical difficulties toward lab-to-fab transition exists in the seamless integration of 2D materials with classic material systems, typically composed of three-dimensional (3D) materials. Owing to the self-passivated nature of 2D surfaces, it is particularly challenging to achieve well-defined interfaces when forming 3D materials on 2D materials (3D-on-2D) heterostructures. Here, we comprehensively review recent progress in 3D-on-2D incorporation strategies, ranging from direct-growth- to layer-transfer-based approaches and from non-epitaxial to epitaxial integration methods. Their technological advances and obstacles are rigorously discussed to explore optimal, yet viable, integration strategies of 3D-on-2D heterostructures. We conclude with an outlook on mixed-dimensional integration processes, identifying key challenges in state-of-the-art technology and suggesting potential opportunities for future innovation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: