Rheumatic heart disease and congenital heart defects represent a major burden among young patients attending cardiology services in East Timor, with nearly one-fifth presenting with severe disease requiring urgent intervention.
Baseline data for cardiology services in Timor-Leste; leaves open true population prevalence and intervention priorities.
BACKGROUND: East Timor is a developing country and is a close neighbour of Australia. The prevalence of cardiac disease is unknown. AIMS: To describe the prevalence and patterns of cardiac disease in patients attending the first cardiology service of Timor-Leste. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective analysis was performed of demographic and clinical data of 474 unique patients referred to outpatient cardiology clinics conducted in East Timor from 2003 to 2016. RESULTS: Mean age was 29.9 ± 18.5 years, with females significantly younger than males (28.8 ± 16.9 vs 32.3 ± 20.6 years). Congenital cardiac disease patients were the youngest (15.5 ± 13.9 years) and cardiomyopathy patients the oldest (46.7 ± 17.8 years). Of patients with rheumatic heart disease, the majority had mitral stenosis (59.4%) and multi-valvular involvement (61.6%). Of note, 28.3% of patients with rheumatic heart disease presented with severe mitral stenosis. Amongst congenital heart disease patients, the most common diagnosis was atrial or ventricular septal defects (61% combined). A total of 19.2% of patients either required immediate referral for intervention or palliation for their cardiac disease. Patients referred to Australia for treatment were significantly younger (19.7 ± 11.7 years) than all other outcome groups. CONCLUSION: Amongst young East Timorese, rheumatic heart disease and unrepaired congenital cardiac defects impose a significant burden. One-fifth of patients present to clinics with severe disease requiring urgent referral for surgery or palliation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paratz et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: