Why the study?
Does routine exercise ECG improve the detection of pathological cardiac arrhythmia compared to resting ECG in young military volunteers?
Does routine exercise ECG improve the detection of pathological cardiac arrhythmia compared to resting ECG in young military volunteers?
Mandatory exercise ECGs in young, preselected military volunteers provide no additional diagnostic yield over resting ECGs for detecting cardiac abnormalities.
Routine stress testing yields no new diagnoses in young military recruits; leaves open whether selective use improves risk stratification.
OBJECTIVES: In health assessments of young temporary-career volunteers who are up for re-enlistment, cardiac stress tests are mandatory to detect cardiac diseases and to confirm physical fitness. So far, there is no information available regarding the extent to which this time-consuming examination contributes to the diagnosis of pathological cardiac arrhythmia in this young, preselected patient collective. METHODS: In a retrospective data analysis, health assessments of 1919 temporary-career volunteers conducted between 2007 and 2012 were examined with regard to pathological findings provided by resting electrocardiograms (ECGs) and exercise ECGs. RESULTS: Only five subjects showed signs of heart disease during the resting ECG; none of the exercise ECGs revealed any abnormalities, even after further cardiological examinations. CONCLUSIONS: In health assessments of young temporary-career volunteers, the exercise ECG as a mandatory examination should be replaced by the resting ECG. In addition to avoiding unnecessary examinations and associated risks, quite a large number of working years could be saved both for medical personnel and the persons examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sammito et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: