Why the study?
Existing heart failure risk scores are not tailored for cancer survivors or designed for electronic medical records and administrative data sets where granular clinical data are often missing.
Does the EMR-based CHERISH risk score improve the prediction of incident heart failure in cancer survivors compared to the ARIC-HF score?
Does the EMR-based CHERISH risk score improve the prediction of incident heart failure in cancer survivors compared to the ARIC-HF score?
The CHERISH risk score provides a scalable, EMR-compatible tool using routine clinical variables to predict the long-term risk of incident heart failure in cancer survivors.
CHERISH underperforms ARIC-HF externally; leaves open whether cancer-specific scores improve EMR-based HF prediction in survivors.
BACKGROUND: Awareness of heart failure (HF) as a long-term complication of cancer has led to an interest in HF surveillance among survivors. However, existing HF risk scores are not tailored for survivors and not designed for the use in electronic medical records (EMRs) or administrative data sets where clinical data such as blood pressure and pathology results are often unavailable. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to develop a cancer-specific incident HF risk score suitable for screening in EMR or administrative data sets. METHODS: The cancer-specific HF prediction from EMRs in survivor health care (CHERISH) risk score was developed from risk variables identified in 16,191 cancer survivors (mean 61 years; 59.5% female) derived from the UK Biobank. External validation was conducted in a population-based Ontario cohort (n = 446,096; mean 67 years; 53.9% female). HF risk classification with CHERISH was compared against the ARIC (Atherosclerotic Risk In Community)-HF score using area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: The CHERISH score incorporates 11 clinical variables-age, years since cancer diagnosis, coronary heart disease, arrhythmia, myocardial infarct, diabetes, hypertension, leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, lung cancer, and breast cancer. CHERISH demonstrated strong prediction of 10-year HF incidence during internal validation (AUC: 0.829), exceeding ARIC-HF (AUC: 0.697; P < 0.001). In external validation, CHERISH showed an AUC of 0.721 in predicting 10-year HF incidence, compared to an AUC of 0.751 (P < 0.001) with ARIC-HF. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of the CHERISH score into EMR systems may provide large-scale, automated HF risk assessment in cancer survivors, using routinely collected clinical data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: