Purpose: To investigate the safety and efficacy of endovascular embolization of cerebral aneurysms at the P1–P3 segments of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA). Materials and Methods: Seventy-seven patients with 77 PCA aneurysms who were treated with endovascular embolization were enrolled, including 35 (45.5%) patients with ruptured aneurysms and 42 (54.5%) with unruptured ones. The pretreatment clinical data and aneurysm occlusion status after treatment and at follow-up were analyzed. Results: All patients were successfully treated endovascularly, including coiling alone in 10 (13.0%) patients, stent-assisted coiling in 18 (23.4%), parent artery occlusion in 25 (32.5%), and pipeline embolization device (PED) in 24 (31.2%). Complete occlusion was achieved in 48 (62.3%) aneurysms, residual neck in 4 (5.2%), and residual aneurysm in the other 25 (32.5%) at the end of embolization. Periprocedural complications occurred in eight patients, including acute thrombosis in seven (9.1%) and intraprocedural subarachnoid hemorrhage in one (1.3%), with the total complication rate of 10.4%. Follow-up was performed in 60 patients (77.9%) for 42 ± 11 months; the mRS score was 0–2 in 55 (91.7%) patients, three in four patients (6.7%), and six in one patient (1.7%). Fifty-three (88.3%) patients (53 aneurysms) had stable or complete occlusion, and seven (11.7%) patients had aneurysm recurrence or residual aneurysm. Among 19 patients treated with PED at follow-up, 15 aneurysms (78.9%) proceeded to complete occlusion while four (21.1%) aneurysms showed residual aneurysm. Conclusion: Endovascular embolization remains a good choice of treatment with high safety and efficacy for posterior cerebral artery aneurysms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: