Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When using peer micro-teaching as a training technique with experienced teachers, the feedback stage is often difficult to handle, because of teacher sensitivity and a reluctance to comment. This article describes a procedure used in in-service training in Turkey, which encouraged feedback dicussion that did not make individual teachers feel threatened. Individual ‘micro-tasks’ were initially discussed in small groups. At a later stage, teachers gave their own comments on their micro-teaching tasks and on the small-group dicussions. Plenary discussion and comment from the lecturer made up the final stage. This concentrated on areas of teaching, rather than individual performances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Edge (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: