Spatial estimators usually provide lower prediction errors than their aspatial counterparts. However, most of the standard techniques require a large number of operations. Fortunately, for a given observation only a relatively small number of nearby observations typically exhibit correlated errors. This means that most of the elements of the n by n spatial matrices are zero. The use of sparse matrix techniques can dramatically lower storage requirements and reduce execution times. In addition, adopting a first differencing model allows the use of GLS which avoids the necessity of evaluating an n by n determinant. This also greatly reduces computational costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pace et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: