Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mechanisms underlying changed K + uptake by plantsat low pH need to be deciphered. One possibility is that K+ acquisition is under the strict control of plasmamembrane potential ( E m ), which,in turn, is affected by external pH. To test this hypothesis, we used themicroelectrode ion flux measurement (MIFE ) technique tostudy net K + and H +fluxes near Arabidopsis root hairs at different externalpH, KCl concentrations and clamped E m . Lowering the solution pH led to strong H+ influx, K + efflux andsignificant E m depolarisation.Addition of K + to the bathing media causedsignificant net K + uptake when external pH wasover the range 5.5–6.0. At external pH below 5.0, however, correlationbetween K + availability and net K+ uptake was negative. To explain this apparentparadox, measurements of net K + and H+ fluxes from the root hair surface were performedconcurrently with E m clamped at different values above and below the restingpotential (approx. –180 mV). Our data revealed a strong dependence ofnet K + flux on the clamping voltage. Clamping atvalues more negative than the resting potential caused a significant increasein K + uptake into the root hair; clamping at lessnegative values (–20 and 0 mV) caused significant net K+ efflux from the cell. Qualitatively similarresults were observed for net H + flux. Ourobservations indicate direct control of K + flux bychanging E m , and suggest that E m depolarisation could be themain reason for the observed K + efflux at low pH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babourina et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: