Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study assessed the flowering-date forecast skill of cherry blossom in Tokyo from 2018 to 2023 using seasonal ensemble forecasts from three numerical weather prediction centers: the Deutscher Wetterdienst, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, and the Météo-France. First, the optimal seven parameters used in the flowering-date estimation model, developed by Maruoka and Itoh (2009), were determined for Tokyo, based on the period from 1994 to 2017, during which the estimation bias was ±1.91 days. Then, flowering dates were predicted using bias-corrected seasonal ensemble forecast of 2 m temperature as a model input. The root-mean-square errors for the flowering-date forecasts initialized on 1st January, February, and March, averaged over all ensemble members, were about ±8.0 days, ±6.2 days, and ±2.3 days, respectively. The best- or worst-performing center is dependent on the specific cases. The grand ensemble forecast, comprising all forecasts from all single-center ensembles, showed better performance in predicting flowering dates of cherry blossoms than the single-center ensemble forecasts alone. These results suggest that the grand ensemble approach at seasonal timescales holds potential for predicting of the growth of flowers and fruits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
YAMAKI et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: