Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Narrative review reveals evolving rectal MRI protocols and staging controversies in rectal cancer, highlighting the need for standardized imaging to guide nonoperative management.
Rectal MRI is a critical tool in the care of patients with rectal cancer, having established roles for primary staging, restaging, and surveillance. The comprehensive diagnostic and prognostic information provided by MRI helps to optimize treatment decision-making. However, challenges persist in the standardization and interpretation of rectal MRI, particularly in the context of rapidly evolving treatment paradigms, including growing acceptance of nonoperative management. In this AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review, we address recent advances and key areas of contention related to the use of MRI for rectal cancer. Our objectives include discussing concepts regarding anatomic localization of rectal tumors; exploring the evolving rectal cancer treatment paradigm and implications for MRI assessment; reviewing updates and controversies regarding rectal MRI for locoregional staging, restaging, and surveillance; reviewing current rectal MRI acquisition protocols; and highlighting challenges in homogenizing and optimizing acquisition parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khasawneh et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: