OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of 17 beta-oestradiol ophthalmic drops in comparison with a traditional tear substitute in postmenopausal women with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. DESIGN: Randomised prospective trial. SETTING: Menopause clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-four postmenopausal women suffering from keratoconjunctivitis sicca and necessitating a hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for general climacteric symptoms. METHODS: The women were randomised into two groups and were given 17 beta-oestradiol eye drops (n = 42, group 1) or a tear substitute (n = 42, group 2). Both groups received a systemic HRT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A Schirmer's test was performed immediately before the beginning of therapy and after four months. In addition, eye symptoms were assessed using a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: A comparison of visual analogue scores at four months in the women who received 17 beta-oestradiol eye drops versus those who received a tear substitute demonstrated a statistically significant difference in all observed ocular symptoms (P < 0.0001). The Schirmer's test revealed a significant difference of results before and after treatment in the oestradiol group (P < 0.0001) while in group 2 no significant difference was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that topical oestrogen is successful in treating keratoconjunctivitis sicca while it seems that the blood-eye barrier prevents systemic oestrogens from acting on the conjunctivae.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sator et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: