This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Single cell protein (SCP, or microbial protein) is a promising alternative food source that could sustainably address the growing demand for proteins. Recently, methane, as the main component of biogas, has been explored as a carbon and energy source for SCP production due to its lower cost and renewability compared to traditional substrates such as carbohydrates. However, a major challenge is how to safely deliver methane and oxygen, and the explosion risk impedes the CH 4 -based SCP production. This study designed a dual-membrane biofilm reactor (dMBfR) for SCP production from methane, incorporating hollow fiber membranes to enhance the delivery of methane and oxygen. Over a 240-day operation, methane utilization efficiency reached 100%, achieving the SCP yield of up to 0.49 g SCP/g CH 4 . The reactor also exhibited competitive protein content of 50.2% and biomass productivity of 506 mg/L/d. Additionally, we evaluated the reactor performance in response to varying aeration modes (open-end versus dead-end) and weekly protein harvest ratios (20% versus 50%). Compared to the dead-end aeration mode, the open-end mode led to 1.5-fold higher SCP production rates, 3.5-fold higher nitrogen-based SCP yields, 3.7-fold higher carbon-based SCP yields, and 1.1-fold higher protein content. Moreover, we applied the freeze-drying approach to produce dry SCP products in the reactor. The final SCP products exhibited higher solubility (17.4%), water holding capacity (5.0%), and emulsifying stability (93.3%, after 24 h incubation) compared to typical fish meals, jointly indicative of the high quality of the produced SCP. This work offers valuable insights into CH 4 -based SCP production, offering a promising avenue for efficient microbial protein synthesis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: