Why the study?
A device to evaluate human pulmonary microcirculation was unavailable, prompting this study to establish a novel catheter-based approach for assessing pulmonary microcirculation in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Can a catheter-based guidewire with temperature and pressure sensors effectively assess pulmonary microcirculatory function in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Can a catheter-based guidewire with temperature and pressure sensors effectively assess pulmonary microcirculatory function in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
A novel catheter-based method using a temperature and pressure sensor guidewire is feasible and safe for assessing pulmonary microcirculatory function in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
A device that can evaluate human pulmonary microcirculation is currently unavailable. This study aimed to establish a novel approach for assessing pulmonary microcirculation in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). We used a guidewire embedded with temperature and pressure sensors to measure the following pulmonary microcirculatory function indicators: pulmonary flow reserve, pulmonary index of microcirculatory resistance (PIMR), and pulmonary resistive reserve ratio. Adenosine was administered to patients to induce hyperemia in the pulmonary artery for assessment. The correlation between these indicators and various parameters, including serum biomarkers, hemodynamic and respiratory functions, and exercise capacity, were examined. The procedure was performed in 19 patients with moderate PH, without major complications. The minimum effective adenosine dosage for maximal hyperemia, without severe side effects, was 150 μg∙kg-1∙min-1. Multivariate stepwise analysis revealed a positive correlation between the hyperemic PIMR and serum uric acid (p < 0.001) and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide levels (p = 0.014). Therefore, this catheter-based method offers an effective means to assess pulmonary microcirculatory function in patients with PH, and the optimal dose of adenosine for this evaluation was 150 μg∙kg-1∙min-1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaji et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: