Randomized trial evaluates oral chlorophyllin, improving quality of life in patients with radiation-induced cystitis, suggesting efficacy for future studies.
Chronic Haemorrhagic Cystitis (cHC) affects 5–15% of patients after pelvic radiotherapy. Sodium-copper-chlorophyllin, a semi-synthetic chlorophyll derivative, has shown promise in preclinical models. The phase II CLARITY trial evaluated oral chlorophyllin for radiation-induced cHC. This prospective, single-centre, single-arm phase II trial (NCT05348239) enrolled adults with grade 2–4 haematuria persisting ≥ 3 months after pelvic radiotherapy. Participants received chlorophyllin 750 mg orally daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), including complete (CR) and partial responses (PR). Secondary endpoints were safety, quality of life [Bladder Cancer Index (urinary function, bother) and EORTC QLQ-C30 (global health, summary score)] and exploratory proteomics. Twenty-four patients were enrolled (cervical cancer 15, rectal 5, prostate 4). Baseline haematuria was CTCAE grade 2 in 6 (25%), grade 3 in 17 (71%), and grade 4 in 1 (4%) patient. In the intention-to treat analysis, the ORR was 70.8% (17/24; 95% CI 65%–83%;) with 9 CR and 8 PR, with a median time to response of 67 days and median response duration of 10 months. The per-protocol ORR was 80.9% (17/21). Chlorophyllin was well tolerated with no discontinuations and no severe adverse events. Side effects included greenish discolouration of stools in 79% and nausea in 16% patients. Significant improvements were noted for urinary function and bother and EORTC QLQ-C30 global health and summary scores. Proteomics suggested modulation of complement, coagulation, inflammatory, oxidative stress, and repair pathways. Oral chlorophyllin showed encouraging response in radiotherapy-related haemorrhagic cystitis with favourable tolerability and quality of life gains. These findings support randomised trials to confirm efficacy and durability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prakash et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: