Evaluates diagnostic boundaries in non-human cognitive systems, suggesting a new evaluation framework.
Current AI evaluation paradigms remain fundamentally bound to human linguistic fluency and task-specific biological benchmarks, leading to severe observer projection and circular evaluation loops. This paper introduces the Intelligence Separation Model (ISM), a framework that formally decouples raw physical execution hardware (L1) from functional cognitive agency (L2). To address the observer boundaries formalised by the Possible Potentials Paradox (PPP), we propose the Architecture-Neutral Evaluation Protocol (ANEP)—a diagnostic framework that replaces human-centric exams with substrate-orthogonal physical and cybernetic invariants. Rather than relying on task performance or conversational outputs, ANEP measures four real-time operational indicators during live environmental shocks: Entropy Compression Ratio {ECR}, Perturbation Recovery Latency {PRL}, Goal-State Persistence {GSP}, and Energy-to-Adaptation Efficiency {EAE}. Finally, we present the structural architecture for anep_eval, an open-source evaluation harness designed to analyze hardware telemetry across digital, optical, and neuromorphic substrates without human observer bias
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravinder Singh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: