Evaluates misalignment detection in electric ships, suggesting protocols for improved accuracy.
Vibration-based diagnosis of propulsion-shaft misalignment supports condition monitoring in electric ships, but reported accuracies are often inflated by overlapping-window leakage and by untested cross-recording, cross-session, and cross-speed generalization. We evaluated leakage-free, deployment-oriented protocols (chronological, leave-one-recording-out (LORO), leave-one-session-out, and leave-one-speed-out) on a 50 kW electric-propulsion land-based test system with six accelerometer channels under 0, 2, and 4 mm offset misalignments, comparing feature-engineered gradient-boosting models, raw-signal deep models, and nominal-speed order-normalized features. Under LORO evaluation, a raw-signal one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) achieved 0.93–1.00 accuracy and outperformed LightGBM in all 15 folds. Under leave-one-speed-out testing, MiniRocket retained 0.775 accuracy, whereas InceptionTime dropped to 0.468. Fixed-Hz features outperformed nominal-speed order-normalized features by 0.079 (p = 0.022), and single-window 1D-CNN inference required 0.50 ms on a CPU. Recording-level and cross-session evaluation are therefore essential for reliable misalignment diagnosis, and raw-signal models provide the strongest deployable performance on the present test rig.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: