Evaluates ICF-Fusion's accuracy in estimating occupant metrics, suggesting improvements in safety systems.
Adaptive restraint systems require specific occupant information, including head position, anthropometry, and safety-relevant posture states. Existing 3D human pose estimation benchmarks mostly report root-relative pose, while automotive in-cabin studies rarely evaluate these outputs across heterogeneous vehicle sensor sets. We present ICF-Fusion, a five-modality transformer fusion architecture, and evaluate it under leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) validation on the ICF-Body dataset, which includes synchronized near-infrared (NIR) camera, 60 GHz millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar, belt webbing extraction sensor (WES), seat configuration sensor (SCS), and ultra-wideband (UWB) recordings. The model localizes the head with a Mean Root Position Error (MRPE) of 6.10 cm and regresses anthropometry to mean absolute errors (MAE) of 5.36 cm for height, 3.50 cm for torso length, 1.78 cm for shoulder width, and 8.61 kg for weight. Feet-on-dashboard is detected on 9 of 10 evaluable folds without meaningful MRPE degradation. The full sensor fusion outperformed every single modality on all three tasks, but NIR alone nearly matched it for head localization and feet-on-dashboard detection. The fusion advantage was substantial only for the anthropometry estimation task.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Preu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: