Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Manifesto examines human freedom and agency in technology-driven environments, suggesting ethical frameworks.
This manifesto examines human freedom in the age of artificial intelligence, algorithmic governance, and life-trajectory systems. It presents the Life Design Roadmap as a human-centred technology that helps individuals analyse possible futures, compare scenarios, assess risks, and consciously shape their own personal trajectory without transferring final decision-making authority to algorithms, institutions, or digital platforms. The document formulates twelve core theses, fourteen fundamental rights, ethical principles, prohibited practices (“red lines”), and requirements for responsible life-trajectory systems. Its central position is that technology should expand human agency, freedom of choice, and digital sovereignty rather than predetermine a person’s future. The manifesto is intended as a conceptual and ethical framework for researchers, educational institutions, public authorities, employers, technology developers, and all those involved in designing personalised human development systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Igor Sokolov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: