Why the study?
Does cilostazol compared to ticlopidine prevent subacute stent thrombosis in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing stenting?
Does cilostazol compared to ticlopidine prevent subacute stent thrombosis in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing stenting?
Cilostazol is less effective than ticlopidine at preventing subacute stent thrombosis in AMI patients after stenting, likely due to weaker inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation.
Cilostazol was associated with higher subacute stent thrombosis risk than ticlopidine in stented AMI; observational data leave open need for confirmatory RCTs.
We compared the effects of ticlopidine and cilostazol on the prevention of subacute stent thrombosis (SAT) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with stenting. We also analyzed the cause of the difference by measuring platelet aggregation activity. Consecutive patients who underwent successful stenting for AMI between March 2001 and March 2004 were analyzed. In addition to aspirin (100 mg/day), cilostazol (200 mg/day) was administered to 99 cases between March 2001 and May 2002 and ticlopidine (200 mg/day) was administered to 85 cases between June 2002 and February 2004. The incidence of SAT within four weeks after stenting was analyzed. Thirty-eight AMI patients were randomized and their platelet aggregation activity was measured using a laser-scattered aggregometer (18 cases in the cilostazol group and 20 cases in the ticlopidine group). SAT did not occur in the ticlopidine group while 5 cases (5.1%) of SAT occurred in the cilostazol group (P < 0.05). The inhibitory activity of cilostazol for ADP-induced platelet aggregation was lower than that of ticlopidine (P < 0.05). Cilostazol with aspirin after stenting in AMI patients showed more frequent SAT than ticlopidine with aspirin. One of the causes for this difference was speculated to be the weaker inhibitory activity of cilostazol for ADP-induced platelet aggregation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawata et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: