Why the study?
Does the composite use of multiple in silico tools and protein topology improve the classification of SCN5A genetic variants in long-QT and Brugada syndromes?
Population
2888 long-QT syndrome cases, 2111 Brugada syndrome cases, and 8975 controls with SCN5A nonsynonymous single…
Comparison
Composite use of 7 in silico tools and… vs Individual in silico tools or topology alone
Design
Case-control
Authors
Loading...
May aid SCN5A nsSNV classification with composite tools; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption in LQTS/Brugada.
Does the composite use of multiple in silico tools and protein topology improve the classification of SCN5A genetic variants in long-QT and Brugada syndromes?
The synergistic use of multiple in silico tools and protein topology enhances the clinical interpretation of SCN5A genetic variants in Brugada and long-QT syndromes.
Kapplinger et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: