DFT-GGA periodic slab calculations were used to examine the adsorption and hydrogenation of ethylene to a surface ethyl intermediate on the Pd(111) surface. The reaction was examined for two different surface coverages, corresponding to (2×3) [low coverage] and (√3×√3) R 30° [high coverage] unit cells. For the low coverage, the di-σ adsorption of ethylene (−62 kJ/mol) is 32 kJ/mol stronger than the π-adsorption mode. The intrinsic activation barrier for hydrogenation of di-σ bonded ethylene to ethyl, for a (2×3) unit cell, was found to be +88 kJ/mol with a reaction energy of +25 kJ/mol. There appeared to be no direct pathway for hydrogenation of π-bonded ethylene to ethyl, for low surface coverages. At higher coverages, however, lateral repulsive interactions between adsorbates destabilize the di-σ adsorption of ethylene to a binding energy of −23 kJ/mol. A favorable surface geometry for the (√3×√3) R 30° coverage is achieved when ethylene is π-bound and hydrogen is bound to a neighboring bridge site. At high coverage, the hydrogenation of di-σ bound ethylene to ethyl has an intrinsic barrier of +82 kJ/mol and a reaction energy of −5 kJ/mol, which is only slightly reduced from the low coverage case. For a (√3×√3) R 30° unit cell, however, the more favorable reaction pathway is via hydrogenation of π-bonded ethylene, with an intrinsic barrier of +36 kJ/mol and an energy of reaction of −18 kJ/mol. This pathway is inaccessible at low coverage. This paper illustrates the importance of weakly bound intermediates and surface coverage effects in reaction pathway analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neurock et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: