Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using a projection method of de Bruijn [Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. A (1981), 43, 39–66], Whittaker & Whittaker [Acta Cryst. (1988), A44, 105–112] obtained nonperiodic tilings of the plane with n-fold rotational symmetry, n = 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 12. However, when their method was applied to the cases of 3-, 4- and 6-fold rotational symmetry it produced periodic tilings. This might be taken as circumstantial evidence that 3-, 4- and 6-fold rotational symmetry is incompatible with nonperiodicity. It is demonstrated that they are compatible by constructing quasiperiodic tilings with only 3-, 4- and 6-fold rotational symmetry. This approach uses basic eigenvalue methods of matrix theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: