Microcirculatory abnormalities contribute to the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of many of the rheumatic diseases. This is best recognized in systemic sclerosis (SSc), in which structural microvessel disease can be well demonstrated using the technique of capillary microscopy [1], and more recently by video and digital capillaroscopy [2, 3]. However, in many other conditions the microvasculature is more subtly involved. By the ‘microvasculature’ we mean the arterioles, the capillaries and the venules. Any inflammatory state is associated with profound microvascular perturbation. For example, in rheumatoid arthritis the synovial microvasculature undergoes major change with formation of new blood vessels (angiogenesis) in the hypertrophied synovium and with lymphocyte trafficking through high endothelial venules. These high endothelial venules are lined by specialized endothelial cells whose formation has been induced during the inflammatory process. [4]. In the study of disease, we must be concerned not only with understanding basic pathophysiology but also with the measurement of disease progression. If we cannot measure the disease, then we cannot assess its progression or responsiveness to treatment. In addition, the ability to measure disease processes can give us indirect insights into pathophysiology by allowing us to assess response to therapeutic interventions which are known to have specific mechanisms of action. Can we measure microvascular disease/involvement by disease, and apply this to the study of rheumatological disorders? As already mentioned, we can examine nailfold capillary structure in certain connective tissue diseases, such as SSc and dermatomyositis, using nailfold microscopy and video capillaroscopy, and one aspect of capillary function (permeability) can be examined by fluoroscopy [5, 6], which is, however, invasive in that it requires an intravenous dye injection. In this review we shall discuss the relatively new technique of laser Doppler imaging (otherwise termed ‘scanning laser Doppler’), which gives a direct measure of microcirculatory flow. We believe laser Doppler imaging affords significant potential in the study of microcirculatory involvement of the rheumatic diseases and it is non-invasive. The observed wavelength of electromagnetic radiation is affected by relative motion between the source and observer. This phenomenon (also applicable to sound waves, as in the technique of Doppler ultrasound) is known as the Doppler effect. When low-level laser light, of a few milliwatts, is directed onto the skin's surface a fraction of the light penetrates the skin and interacts with both static tissue and moving cells (primarily red blood cells). The penetration depth of light is dependent upon the tissue morphology, absorption and the wavelength used [7, 8]. The light that is reflected or randomly scattered from the static tissue remains unchanged in wavelength. In contrast the light that is scattered from the moving blood cells undergoes a small change in wavelength, proportional to the speed of the erythrocytes, due to the Doppler effect. Backscattered light from the tissue, incident on a detector, is processed to provide a signal that is proportional to the speed and density of the moving cells [9]. Stern [10] was the first to exploit the Doppler effect to monitor blood flow. He collected the backscattered light, Doppler-broadened according to the internal motion of circulation, on a photodetector. He demonstrated the difference in perfusion of a fingertip under normal flow conditions and those of brachial occlusion using a helium–neon (HeNe, 633 nm) laser. It was also noted that, after administration of ethanol, the vasodilatory effects were observed as an increase in blood flow at the fingertip, which increased over a 15-min period. From these initial observations came the method of laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF): fibre-delivered, single-point perfusion monitoring. LDF has been adapted and improved to remove many of the preliminary problems and has been widely used both in research and as a clinical tool over the past 20 yr in the measurement of cutaneous microcirculatory flow. The technique with which most clinicians are familiar is the single-probe technique. Single-probe laser Doppler has been used extensively by rheumatologists to quantify blood flow in studies of Raynaud's phenomenon [11–14]. The principles underlying this technique are demonstrated in Fig. 1a: the laser light is delivered to the tissue surface via an optical fibre and the backscattered and reflected light is collected by a second (or several) fibre(s). Delivery and collection fibres are housed in a single probe. (a) Schematic of LDF. (b) Schematic of LDI. The incident laser light beam has a depth of penetration of approximately 1 mm, depending upon the wavelength and configuration of the equipment used. Therefore all elements of the dermis may be included, from superficial nutritional to deeper thermoregulatory vessels. For a given wavelength of light, the absorption spectrum of components of the tissue determines the interaction that occurs [7]. The penetration of light is predetermined by the path that the light takes through the skin and is limited by the absorption of the tissue. Towards the red end of the visible spectrum haemoglobin and water absorption are lower, hence the dominance of the HeNe laser in earlier LDF. For this same reason, near-infrared diode lasers (670, 780 and 810–850 nm) are also popular; these long wavelengths exhibit a deeper penetration depth and, due to the low absorption of melanin in the near infrared, show less dependence on skin colour. where k is an arbitrary constant. Flux is expressed in terms of arbitrary perfusion units, which do not give absolute values for the blood flow speed. Therefore, although it is not meaningful to compare absolute values of perfusion between individuals, intra- and inter-individual comparisons of dynamic responses (to standard stimuli) can be made. The LDF instrument can be calibrated in perfusion units by measuring the Brownian motion of a standard suspension of polystyrene microparticles in water. LDF offers continuous perfusion measurement. However, cutaneous circulation is known to be heterogeneous, and examining a small area of perfusion does not necessarily give representative data for the surrounding perfusion [16]. This problem can be overcome by collection of blood flow data over a larger area. A relatively recent application of laser Doppler is the development of laser Doppler imaging (LDI). This technique has two major advantages over the single-probe technique. (i) The first is that blood flow is measured over an area rather than at a single site, obviating some of the difficulties with site-to-site variability inherent in the signal-probe technique. Thus, reproducibility might be improved. (ii) Secondly, the laser beam is non-contact, as opposed to the single probe, which involves direct contact with the skin and which could, therefore, through this contact, influence blood flow via pressure and movement artefacts [17]. Figure 1b illustrates the principles underlying the LDI technique. The laser beam, approximately 1 mm in diameter, is scanned across tissue in two dimensions using a moving mirror. The scattered light signal is analysed to provide a two-dimensional image of blood flow. The bandwidth of the collected signal varies according to the scan speed (ms/pixel). A high-frequency cut-off (∼3–22 kHz) improves the signal-to-noise ratio and a low-frequency cut-off (∼20–250 Hz) eliminates movement artefacts. This low-frequency cut-off has some effect on the ability to measure low-speed blood flows; for low perfusion a slower scan rate can be used. Both large (e.g. torso) and small (e.g. finger, hand) areas can be scanned, larger areas by increasing the imaging height. Figure 2 shows a laser Doppler imager in use. LDI system in use. As the laser beam scans across the hand, the image appears on the monitor. Already a number of investigators have recognized the potential of the technique for clinical application and some examples of these clinical applications in specialities other than rheumatology are as follows. Several groups have described the measurement of burn depth with LDI [18–20]. Brown et al. [21] demonstrated the use of LDI in the evaluation of the clinical management of vesicant burns and Jeng et al. [22] described LDI confirmation of clinical judgement in the requirement for excision of burns of indeterminate depth. Dermatologists have drawn attention to the fact that, because of its accessibility, the skin provides the opportunity of studying mechanisms of inflammation. Harrison et al. [23] described the increase in cutaneous blood flow imaged during the tuberculin reaction. Clough [24] reported how LDI allows us to build upon pathophysiological studies (in this particular example investigating the role of nitric oxide in dermal inflammation) by including direct measurement of microvascular response. Eichhorn et al. [25] used LDI to monitor the healing of flaps in the maxillofacial area, identifying necrotic areas, venous stasis and normal wound healing. Ljung et al. [26] examined postoperative wound healing. Responses to heating and iontophoresis have been assessed in both patients with arterial disease and patients with diabetes [27]. Dermal replacement therapy for foot ulceration has been monitored in diabetic patients [28] and diabetologists have applied LDI in the study of other aspects of disease, including autonomic responses [29]. In rheumatology, an obvious clinical application is in quantitation of dermal blood flow in patients with primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon. To date a small number of cross-sectional studies have explored the potential of LDI to measure blood flow in patients with Raynaud's and SSc. Seifalian et al. [30] recommend the application of LDI in patients with vascular disease, including Raynaud's phenomenon, citing its advantages over single-point LDF, as a method to monitor perfusion in the hands of patients with SSc. We know that dermal microcirculatory flow is reduced, at least during vasospastic attacks, as evidenced by the classic colour changes which occur in the skin of the digits during these episodic attacks of ischaemia, which characterize the condition. Thus, in patients with Raynaud's is in flow at least in response to a dynamic and it is that in many patients with Raynaud's secondary to structural blood disease, as occurs in SSc is flow under Thus, blood flow studies to both conditions and dynamic responses to a a or et al. have laser Doppler in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon, patients with SSc and examining effects of a reported that patients with SSc demonstrated perfusion than patients with primary Raynaud's and and that between groups more during the and et al. the changes in perfusion due to and in patients with vasospastic disease and the were to to then induced a in changes in blood flow monitored by LDI were to be to patients from A small study to in the first between patients with patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon and was reported by were of the of the at of and at and it was that two using the imaging technique in the and the difference in between the of the same hand) were to across the However, were across groups using Figure (i) the of the how are (ii) the fingertip in patients with and the of the between in patients with the between the of the structural vascular of the perfusion of hands at to and and with SSc. The is image high low are at the same for is how LDI to as a measurement well in the of Raynaud's phenomenon Seifalian et al. comparisons between and identifying a of between the two that such as the of in tissue by radiation and may for the between direct blood flow and A of the of LDI and was also by et al. examining the difference between the of the and the of the were at both and for both The study that LDI and In contrast to which blood flow on a tissue which other internal and may influence and which is offers which the given by the LDI has also been with in the evaluation of digital patients were for of one and one LDI perfusion well with and function and the investigators its use to assess the of LDI was not to be a replacement but to provide to The cross-sectional studies described that LDI evaluation in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon, including studies of reproducibility and has been in the of response to However, we have demonstrated the potential of LDI in change in microcirculatory flow in response to with SSc and primary Raynaud's phenomenon and all demonstrated a in perfusion after administration of in with after and with treatment. the of digital microcirculatory flow in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon is a obvious application of are many other potential applications in disease, as described et al. used LDI to measure over in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using red and near increase in perfusion was observed in the of patients in with which was more at than at 633 blood flow over the small of the as in this might quantify the of inflammation. In this it is that absolute are to be of but rather the ratio of the to over to quantify dermal blood flow in this might be in measuring the and this also be for tissue inflammation. For example, the of a or of a might be assessed by at the of the affected and after In a study with patients with rheumatoid et al. the advantages of LDI over such as imaging and in identifying the of and potential for the and of disease progression were examined at both 633 and the initial scans of the obvious of the red laser to image perfusion at the to the imaged with only the near-infrared that the source of is the of skin near-infrared laser penetrates more than the the patients examined during the were observed to have a significant increase in perfusion at the affected with allowing to be into two with high and low this to the of disease, the perfusion to to those in the a between increased blood flow and an inflammatory in the were not as the source of of perfusion as imaged with LDI with areas of or by of This study that LDI and a study using LDI for of in the of the only of at this wavelength nm) was over a in a single which was associated with the and The that wavelengths be Thus, LDI offers potential in the of disease, both with to of and to be of response. The pathogenesis of also known as is it is that both and microvascular contribute using to in affected and in measured superficial blood flow with LDI during and after was observed in both patients and in as an increase in perfusion with and was increased in et al. used LDI to examine the response of patients and to iontophoresis of in to assess microvascular were between the affected and for patients and also between the responses of patients and significant were between the perfusion increase in or between patients and The study that was not associated with of microvascular endothelial However, it was that this may the of the disease process. These studies the ability of LDI to provide into conditions associated with abnormalities in Ljung et al. [26] measured microcirculatory flow and after replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis to monitor wound healing. flow and hence the that not blood flow. The application of LDI may be in tissue inflammatory A single of has been described by et al. in which LDI was used in with and measurement to the changes in and blood flow of in the affected was observed to over an and LDI was to be more than tissue surface to changes in inflammation. have also been by LDI and because is of to from both clinical and research we that this be et al. used LDI to in blood flow and to the of A increase in perfusion was the area with surrounding tissue, and an of mm of increased blood flow was the of the as measured by et al. also that a of increased the of the et al. that was not for the increase in perfusion observed in by both blood flow and upon administration of In a second study the same that of the perfusion et al. the inflammatory response of patients to with LDI. that initial skin be by therapy according to the skin et al. the blood flow of and after function of the skin was using reported that the increase in blood flow with a in with in contrast to where increased perfusion with an increased with This that the response of patients with is these studies how LDI has been applied in patients with to study the pathophysiology as well as the response. with disease are at increased of skin for a of and can be for example, the with rheumatoid arthritis and in the et al. have LDI studies on the microcirculatory of study was by the to which have been to healing and increase the blood flow of The effects of and were The have also used LDI in with capillary microscopy to image and compare and venous known to both the thermoregulatory and the The of the was to study including the between laser Doppler and capillary both the and the surrounding tissue and to examine these data and the development and healing of the LDI measurement of perfusion in the in contrast to capillary microscopy which imaged the superficial flow both of was as and the of was in the two of pathogenesis in this of representative of wound a blood flow than those with for venous a of a density of capillaries imaged by in the area. were to have high blood flow and low blood venous were to have and high associated with venous in these The that the development of both of is during from to but that the surrounding skin due to the underlying of be of LDI to used a wavelength of 633 the and absorption of light by blood and tissue is using wavelengths of tissue to be increasing the potential applications of the technique. with LDF, only a few studies have been to compare et al. that a more superficial blood flow than 633 and red wavelengths in and in and et al. between 633 and red and wavelengths to in the absorption and of the skin and, in the of the light, to the absorption of and that using a of red and wavelengths between capillary and flow and the of blood absorption and over tissue absorption for imaging depth at these Therefore the of red and wavelengths affords the of between deeper thermoregulatory and more superficial nutritional LDF studies have been with near nm) and nm) et al. in the of and demonstrated that the laser measured a However, it was that the perfusion was not from capillary blood flow because changes in laser not changes in blood flow as measured by capillary A second study by the same measured blood flow in patients with vascular disease with the laser with the near laser and not the capillary microscopy et al. explored the use of wavelengths and nm) in with red in LDI and that this wavelength have potential a deeper skin penetration is and in patients with The wavelength, applied to the in demonstrated increased blood flow in with flow was measured with the wavelength than with the and the that this that the wavelength was flow in rather than the has some preliminary clinical studies with red and nm) investigating patients with primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon and reported only in were to between the two example of a in a to is in Fig. imaged with both red and From these initial it can be that the area of response and the of the effect as imaged by the two The two are on to the contrast between the increased perfusion and however, the area and response of the in with remains the of the the are with to comparisons of cannot be the two wavelengths to in the and blood by the difference in values for the this is one for dynamic of of the of the moving from to to is by induced by heating in a which to is approximately 1 in As imaged by (a) and (b) 633 The was by a heating at 2 in The was increased to in of and then at this for was To the are used for and the have been The increase to and of are for perfusion imaged by the red wavelength than for that imaged by the The increase of the from for the scans is for 633 and for wavelengths may the potential of the laser Doppler technique to rheumatologists by (i) allowing of blood flow in deeper such as and the of superficial and (ii) allowing more of the skin than has been with for the study of the pathophysiology of Raynaud's phenomenon and LDF, LDI is in the research LDI provides arbitrary perfusion its as an tool in data such as and or response. It is that are under the same conditions where (e.g. same same and with the same LDI (e.g. wavelength, values and image to It may also be to which are more to LDF, such as the and of the or comparisons between wavelengths are made. it be to that the imager is incident on for example the signal to this is not the an known as the of the This is the of signal due to components of the which or This be for a given single wavelength imager and is not of The however, varies from to and the signal from static tissue with blood for example, the signal from a finger, This signal is due to including motion the and Brownian motion of cells When more than one wavelength is it must be that absolute comparisons cannot be the light penetrates to may image vessels and may have and to be is skin colour. As are more for light to due to absorption by and near-infrared wavelengths to be used to overcome this However, or vasodilatory are used it is to that skin in with increased blood flow and that this may the signal which is used to the in blood flow over to and over to changes may to be into as does the effect of and and certain example which have been to have significant effects on the laser Doppler technique LDI to as laser and with two wavelengths is As less and more it is that be a movement of LDI from research into clinical In to of rheumatological of LDI into conditions which have only been with LDF is These systemic studies that although perfusion is as observed by capillaroscopy, blood flow is not but rather via blood flow (in which LDF studies to and (to the between and A for development is optical Doppler a non-contact, in imaging which allows the of of tissue structure and blood perfusion blood flow The technique is on a of LDF and optical which is widely used in research for an of imaging with has been on normal and in specific such as and et al. that of into for in provides imaging with high of over a of penetration from the superficial to the as by the As the beam from a light source is onto and scanned across the surface of the a image of the of tissue is in This can then be at to provide a image of tissue structure in to the laser is or the area of is by a beam, rather than is in but for across the area The of with LDF in provides an imaging system with and blood flow which is and has many potential applications across a of of which have already been explored with preliminary research but are which are of in the area of The method allows of skin over a continuous of for example, studies of with and of penetration and LDI has already to the measurement of cutaneous perfusion in rheumatic diseases and to an understanding of the potential of the technique is to be most studies have been studies disease progression and response to provide into pathophysiology and As and equipment to the as for example, which the of reproducibility the same The relatively new of and the study of rheumatic diseases, allowing imaging of tissue and blood flow at We to for The have of of and of and of
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrea Murray (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: