Professional library education in New Zealand and Australia has developed independently, with different structures for entry-level qualifications. Both countries face challenges in continuing to offer high-quality programmes, in part due to the distribution of students relative to the providers. This paper outlines the LIS qualifications and characteristics of the providers in each country, followed by a discussion of issues the programmes face in remaining relevant in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brenda Chawner (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: