This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction Stem CO 2 efflux ( E c ) reflects the amount of photo-assimilated carbon released back into the atmosphere and plays a critical role in the carbon balance of tree and forest ecosystems. Despite previous studies indicating that a portion of stem CO 2 originates from root respiration ( R root ), the seasonal dynamics of E c and its relationship with belowground respiration remain poorly understood, particularly in tropical regions characterized by distinct dry and wet seasons. Methods To address this gap, we investigated E c in tapping and non-tapped rubber trees, along with environmental factors and physiological traits (sap flow flux density, root respiration, and leaf area index) from 2018 to 2021. Results Our results showed that tapping activity increased the E c of rubber trees compared to non-tapped trees, with increases ranging from 10.37% to 233.66%. However, the magnitude of this increase varied between the dry and wet seasons. Although tapping enhanced the E c , it did not alter the E c seasonal pattern. Consequently, E c in both tapped and non-tapped rubber trees displayed an overall single-peak pattern, with significantly lower values during the dry season compared to the wet season, suggesting growth phenology primarily regulates E c seasonal dynamics. Structural equation modeling revealed that root respiration ( R root ), sap flow flux density ( F d ), and soil moisture at 50 cm depth as the primary drivers of the E c variations during the dry season. In contrast, soil moisture at 5 cm depth and air temperature ( T a ) were identified as dominant factors influencing E c in the wet season, with belowground respiration having a negligible influence. Discussion These results suggest that the relationship between E c and belowground respiration is environmentally sensitive and exhibits seasonal dependency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: