Three different types of polynuclear Mn II complexes with carboxylate bridges were obtained from the reaction of Mn(RCOO) 2 with 2,2‘-bipyridine (bpy). Dinuclear complexes [Mn 2 (μ-RCOO) 2 (bpy) 4 ](ClO 4 ) 2 with R = 2-ClPh, 3-ClPh, 4-ClPh, Ph ( 1 − 4 ); trinuclear complexes [Mn 3 (μ-RCOO) 6 (bpy) 2 ] with R = 2-ClPh, 3-ClPh ( 5, 6 ), [Mn 3 (μ-RCOO) 6 (2,2‘-Me 2 -bpy) 2 ] with R = 2-ClPh, 3-ClPh, 4-ClPh ( 7 − 9 ), and 1D complexes [Mn(μ-RCOO) 2 (bpy)] n with R = 3-ClPh, 4-ClPh ( 10, 11 ). [Mn 2 (μ-PhCOO) 2 (bpy) 4 ](ClO 4 ) 2 ( 4 ) and the [Mn(μ-3-ClPhCOO) 2 (bpy)] n · n H 2 O ( 10 ) have been characterized by X-ray diffraction. Complex 4 crystallizes in the triclinic system, space group P 1̄ with a = 9.1886(10) Å, b = 11.6135(9) Å, c = 13.595(2) Å, α = 66.225(13)°, β = 84.073(12)°, γ = 88.593(10)°, Z = 1. Complex 10 crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group C 2/ c with a = 26.376(5) Å, b = 12.404(3) Å, c = 7.095(1) Å, β = 96.10(3)°, Z = 4. The other complexes were characterized by XANES and EXAFS studies, by comparison with analogous complexes of known X-ray crystal structure. The Mn···Mn distances in the dinuclear complexes and in the infinite chains were similar ( av 4.5 Å) and longer than for the trinuclear complexes ( av 3.6 Å); this is in agreement with the number of carboxylate bridges: two in the first case and three for the trinuclear complexes. All the polynuclear complexes shown very weak antiferromagnetic coupling ( J between −0.7 and −3.22 cm - 1 ). So, at low temperatures more than one spin state may be populated and many possible transitions may be expected in the EPR spectra; each series shows a similar spectrum, which is different from the others.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albela et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: