Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two series of Fe 2 O 3 /TiO 2 samples were prepared via impregnation and photodeposition methods. The effect of preparation method on the properties and performance of Fe 2 O 3 /TiO 2 for photocatalytic degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) under UV light irradiation was examined. The Fe 2 O 3 /TiO 2 nanocomposites prepared by impregnation showed lower activity than the unmodified TiO 2 , mainly due to lower specific surface area caused by heat treatment. On the other hand, the Fe 2 O 3 /TiO 2 nanocomposites prepared by photodeposition showed higher photocatalytic activity than the unmodified TiO 2 . Three times higher photocatalytic activity was obtained on the best photocatalyst, Fe 2 O 3 (0.5)/TiO 2 . The improved activity of TiO 2 after photodeposition of Fe 2 O 3 was contributed to the formation of a heterojunction between the Fe 2 O 3 and TiO 2 nanoparticles that improved charge transfer and suppressed electron–hole recombination. A further investigation on the role of the active species on Fe 2 O 3 /TiO 2 confirmed that the crucial active species were both holes and superoxide radicals. The Fe 2 O 3 (0.5)/TiO 2 sample also showed good stability and reusability, suggesting its potential for water purification applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: