Key result
Presentation to a high-volume emergency department for atrial fibrillation and flutter was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of hospital admission (aOR 0.68) compared to low-volume departments.
Why the study?
Does presentation to high-volume emergency departments improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and flutter?
Cohort (n=45,372)
Yes
Does presentation to high-volume emergency departments improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and flutter?
Patients presenting to high-volume emergency departments for atrial fibrillation and flutter have lower admission rates and fewer ED revisits, with higher specialist referrals, compared to low-volume EDs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-volume EDs linked to fewer AF admissions; hypothesis-generating for volume-based pathways, prospective trials needed before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: Clinical familiarity plays a role in health outcomes; the relationship between emergency department (ED) volume and outcomes for atrial fibrillation and flutter (AFF) are not clear. We compared ED presentation outcomes for AFF between high (HV) and low volume (LV) EDs in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: 45,372 AFF presentations for patients aged ≥ 35 years from all 104 EDs in Alberta during 1999 to 2011 using administrative health databases formed a retrospective cohort. EDs were grouped by annual AFF volume: 11 high (>100 presentations) or 93 low (≤100 presentations). Outcomes included hospital admission rate, return to ED for AFF within 30 and 90 days, and death within 30 and 90 days. Analyses included statistical tests and mixed effects modeling. RESULTS: Mean age at ED presentation was 69.8 years (52% male). HV ED presentations were associated with lower admissions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64, 0.72; p-value [p]<0.001), ED returns at 90 (aOR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.73, 0.90; p<0.001) days, and a higher likelihood of specialist visits at 30 (aOR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.68, 1.94; p<0.001) and 90 (aOR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.76, 2.03; p<0.001) days. For admitted patients, there were fewer returns to HV EDs at 30 (aOR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.15, 0.87; p = 0.02) and 90 (aOR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.26, 0.89; p = 0.02) days after hospital discharge. There was no difference in death between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: AFF patients presenting to HV EDs experienced fewer admissions and AFF ED revisit and higher specialist referrals compared to LV EDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosychuk et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and flutter (n=45,372). High-volume emergency department (>100 AFF presentations/year) vs. Low-volume emergency department (≤100 AFF presentations/year) was evaluated on Hospital admission at index ED presentation (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.64, 0.72, p=<0.001). Presentation to a high-volume emergency department for atrial fibrillation and flutter was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of hospital admission (aOR 0.68) compared to low-volume departments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: