Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of macular buckling surgery using a special exoplant. Methods: The authors reviewed 33 cases of patients with retinal detachment due to macular hole with posterior staphyloma who underwent a macular bucking procedure and 11 cases of patients with the same condition due to macular hole without posterior staphyloma or due to a hole along the edge of the posterior staphyloma who underwent gas injection or vitrectomy. The reattachment rate, visual acuity (VA). and area size (V-4,1-4 isopter) by Goldmann perimetry were calculated. Results: Reattachment rate for the macular buckling procedure was 94% (initial) and 100% (final), and that for the gas injection or vitrectomy was 100% (both initial and final). Twenty of the 33 eyes (60.6%) had VA of 20/400 or better, and none of these 33 eyes had a VA at the level of finger counting or poorer following macular buckling. Nine of the 11 eyes (81.8%) had VA of 20/400 or better, and none of these 11 eyes had a VA at the level of finger counting or poorer following the gas injection or vitrectomy. The area size of V-4 isopter in the macular buckling group was significantly larger than that in the gas injection or vitrectomy group (P = 0.017). Conclusion: The macular buckling procedure is effective when considered both from an anatomic and a functional perspective for retinal detachment due to macular hole with posterior staphyloma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasoh et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: