Key result
High on-treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel was observed in 71% of patients after PFO/ASD closure, yet no stroke or thrombus formation occurred during 6-month follow-up.
Why the study?
Does antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin result in high on-treatment platelet reactivity and clinical complications in patients undergoing PFO/ASD closure?
Observational (n=140)
Does antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin result in high on-treatment platelet reactivity and clinical complications in patients undergoing PFO/ASD closure?
Despite a 71% incidence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel after PFO/ASD closure, no strokes or occluder thrombi occurred, questioning the clinical benefit of routine dual antiplatelet therapy in this setting.
High on-treatment platelet reactivity may not increase thrombotic risk after PFO/ASD closure; leaves open whether routine testing should guide antiplatelet therapy.
The optimal antiplatelet therapy after patent foramen ovale (PFO)/ atrium septum defect (ASD) closure is a matter of discussion. It is challenging as inter-individual responses to antiplatelet medication vary significantly and common complications are bleeding and ischemic events. In this study, we aimed to analyze the incidence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to antiplatelet medication in patients undergoing PFO/ASD closure as well as clinical complications and thrombus formation on the occluder during six-month follow-up. This hypothesis generating pilot study was observed, which included 140 patients undergoing PFO/ASD closure. The primary endpoint was pharmacodynamic response to antiplatelet medication. A composite of death, myocardial infarction, bleeding, stroke and thrombus formation on the occluder during six-month follow-up was the secondary endpoint. HTPR to clopidogrel was analyzed using the vasodilator-stimulated protein phosphorylation (VASP), HTPR to aspirin by light-transmission aggregometry (LTA). In 71% of patients HTPR to clopidogrel was detected, HTPR to aspirin in only 4%. We observed 12 complications, 9 bleeding events (including 3 major bleeding events) and 3 transient ischemic attacks. No stroke and no thrombus formation on the occluder occurred. The primary endpoint was not associated with the secondary endpoint. The incidence of HTPR to clopidogrel in PFO/ASD closure patients is very high. Despite this high incidence, no stroke or thrombus formation on the occluder occurred at all. This leads to the hypothesis, that the benefit of additional clopidogrel medication is questionable and has to be investigated in large-scale clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polzin et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrium septum defect (ASD) (n=140). Clopidogrel and aspirin was evaluated on Pharmacodynamic response to antiplatelet medication (high on-treatment platelet reactivity). High on-treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel was observed in 71% of patients after PFO/ASD closure, yet no stroke or thrombus formation occurred during 6-month follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: