Key result
Transcatheter device closure of PFO was not superior to standard medical therapy in the secondary prevention of stroke or TIA in the intention-to-treat analysis (HR 0.66, p=0.056).
Why the study?
Does transcatheter device closure reduce the composite of death, stroke, and TIA in patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO compared to standard medical therapy?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,303)
Yes
Does transcatheter device closure reduce the composite of death, stroke, and TIA in patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO compared to standard medical therapy?
Transcatheter PFO closure was not superior to medical therapy for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke in intention-to-treat analysis, but showed benefit in per-protocol analysis and in male patients, alongside an increased risk of atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support routine PFO closure for cryptogenic stroke prevention; confirms ITT nonsuperiority while leaving per-protocol signals for targeted trials.
BACKGROUND: There is an association between cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO). The optimal treatment strategy for secondary prevention remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze aggregate data examining the safety and efficacy of transcatheter device closure versus standard medical therapy in patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke. METHODS: A search of published data identified 3 randomized clinical trials for inclusion. The primary outcome was a composite end-point of death, stroke and transient-ischemic attack (TIA). Pre-defined subgroup analysis was performed with respect to baseline characteristics including age, sex, atrial septal aneurysm and shunt size. Data was synthesized using a random effects model and results presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A cohort of 2,303 patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke and PFO were randomized to device closure (n = 1150) and medical therapy (n = 1153). Mean follow-up was 2.5 years. Transcatheter closure was not superior to medical therapy in the secondary prevention of stroke or TIA in intention-to-treat analysis (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.01; p = 0.056). However, the results were statistically significant using per-protocol analysis (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.98; p = 0.043). Males had significant benefit with device closure (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.96; p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, using intention-to-treat analysis, transcatheter device closure of PFO was not superior to standard medical therapy in the secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke. Transcatheter closure was superior using per-protocol analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riaz et al. (2013) conducted a meta-analysis in Cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO) (n=2,303). Transcatheter device closure vs. Standard medical therapy was evaluated on Composite of death, stroke, and transient-ischemic attack (TIA) (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.43-1.01, p=0.056). Transcatheter device closure of PFO was not superior to standard medical therapy in the secondary prevention of stroke or TIA in the intention-to-treat analysis (HR 0.66, p=0.056).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: