Why the study?
Purulent bacterial pericarditis remains a diagnostic challenge due to non-specific features and carries high mortality and morbidity, including constrictive pericarditis in survivors.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Purulent bacterial pericarditis caused by rare commensal organisms like Actinomyces meyeri should be considered in patients presenting with apparent recurrent pericarditis or effusive-constrictive disease, and frequently requires combined prolonged beta-lactam therapy and surgical pericardiectomy for definitive source control.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Raises awareness of Actinomyces meyeri in recurrent pericarditis; hypothesis-generating for combined antibiotic-surgical management in this rare entity.
Background Purulent bacterial pericarditis (PBP) is a highly lethal infection of the pericardial space that arises as a complication of infective illnesses. Purulent bacterial pericarditis remains a diagnostic challenge given its non-specific clinical and investigative features and carries exceedingly high mortality rates due to fulminant sepsis and morbidity including constrictive pericarditis in survivors. We present our management of cardiac tamponade and subsequent constrictive pericarditis due to Actinomyces meyeri PBP. Case summary A 53-year-old Caucasian male presented with acute New York Heart Association Class IV dyspnoea and chest discomfort, in the context of multiple hospital presentations over the preceding 8 weeks due to presumed recurrent viral pericarditis. On this admission, initial transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) demonstrated a large asymmetric pericardial effusion for which he underwent urgent pericardiocentesis. Serial TTE post-pericardiocentesis, however, demonstrated effusion re-accumulation and effusive-constrictive pericarditis, confirmed on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Fluid culture was positive for A. meyeri. He was diagnosed with PBP, but his condition deteriorated despite appropriate intravenous antibiotic therapy, necessitating semi-urgent surgical pericardiectomy. He recovered well and was discharged on Day 10 post-operatively. Discussion Unlike uncomplicated acute viral or idiopathic pericarditis, PBP portends a very poor prognosis if unrecognized and untreated. Diagnostic challenges persist given its rarity in modern clinical practice; however, PBP should be considered in cases of seemingly recurrent pericarditis. Multi-modal cardiac imaging and careful analysis of pericardial fluid including cultures and lactate dehydrogenase/serum ratios may assist in earlier recognition. In this case, source control and symptom relief were achieved only with combined intravenous antibiotics, surgical evacuation, and pericardiectomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eng‐Frost et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Purulent bacterial pericarditis due to Actinomyces meyeri with cardiac tamponade and effusive-constrictive pericarditis (n=1). Urgent pericardiocentesis, intravenous benzylpenicillin, oral amoxicillin, and semi-urgent surgical pericardiectomy was evaluated on Complete symptom resolution and infectious source control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: