Key result
Poor dietary quality and low adherence to dietary recommendations remain prevalent among patients after a coronary heart disease event, highlighting the need for effective post-event nutrition counseling.
Why the study?
What are the dietary practices and adherence to dietary recommendations of patients after a coronary heart disease event?
What are the dietary practices and adherence to dietary recommendations of patients after a coronary heart disease event?
Despite the importance of high dietary quality in reducing recurrent disease risk, few CHD patients adhere to dietary recommendations, highlighting a critical gap in post-event care.
Persistent poor post-CHD dietary adherence signals secondary prevention gaps; leaves open optimal counseling strategies for trials.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To examine dietary quality for patients after a coronary heart disease (CHD) event using a selective review. RECENT FINDINGS: Poor dietary quality is a risk for patients before and after CHD events. Although cardiac rehabilitation programs often contain a nutrition education component and are advised for many patients, few patients attend cardiac rehabilitation. The American population experiences many difficulties with adherence to a higher-quality diet. A diet high in dietary quality is important in reducing risk of recurrent disease, yet few patients who have faced life-threatening cardiac events are adherent to such dietary recommendations. SUMMARY: A review of the literature indicates the need for postevent dietary evaluation and effective nutrition counseling with ongoing follow-up. In addition, we need to demonstrate the effectiveness of such approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2010) conducted a review in Coronary heart disease. Dietary quality was evaluated. Poor dietary quality and low adherence to dietary recommendations remain prevalent among patients after a coronary heart disease event, highlighting the need for effective post-event nutrition counseling.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: