Key result
Above average suicidality detected via NLP during admission increased the risk of non-eating disorder psychiatric readmission in the US cohort (OR 3.48; P<.001) but not the UK cohort (OR 1.34; P=.32).
Why the study?
Suicidality in eating disorders is common, but studies examining its association with readmission across international cohorts are sparse.
Does above average suicidality detected via NLP during admission predict subsequent readmission within 2 years in patients hospitalized for eating disorders?
Cohort (n=1,546)
Yes
Does above average suicidality detected via NLP during admission predict subsequent readmission within 2 years in patients hospitalized for eating disorders?
NLP-detected suicidality during eating disorder admissions predicts subsequent psychiatric readmission in a US cohort, but this finding did not replicate in a UK cohort, highlighting potential differences in clinical documentation or patient populations.
Suicidality may flag higher readmission risk after eating disorder discharge; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the association between suicidality and subsequent readmission for patients hospitalized for eating disorder treatment, within 2 years of discharge, at two large academic medical centers in two different countries. METHODS: Over an 8-year study window from January 2009 to March 2017, we identified all inpatient eating disorder admissions at Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA (WCM) and South London and Maudsley Foundation NHS Trust, London, UK (SLaM). To establish each patient's-suicidality profile, we applied two natural language processing (NLP) algorithms, independently developed at the two institutions, and detected suicidality in clinical notes documented in the first week of admission. We calculated the odds ratios (OR) for any subsequent readmission within 2 years postdischarge and determined whether this was to another eating disorder unit, other psychiatric unit, a general medical hospital admission or emergency room attendance. RESULTS: We identified 1126 and 420 eating disorder inpatient admissions at WCM and SLaM, respectively. In the WCM cohort, evidence of above average suicidality during the first week of admission was significantly associated with an increased risk of noneating disorder-related psychiatric readmission (OR 3.48 95% CI = 2.03-5.99, p-value < .001), but a similar pattern was not observed in the SLaM cohort (OR 1.34, 95% CI = 0.75-2.37, p = .32), there was no significant increase in risk of admission. In both cohorts, personality disorder increased the risk of any psychiatric readmission within 2 years. DISCUSSION: Patterns of increased risk of psychiatric readmission from above average suicidality detected via NLP during inpatient eating disorder admissions differed in our two patient cohorts. However, comorbid diagnoses such as personality disorder increased the risk of any psychiatric readmission across both cohorts. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Suicidality amongst is eating disorders is an extremely common presentation and it is important we further our understanding of identifying those most at risk. This research also provides a novel study design, comparing two NLP algorithms on electronic health record data based in the United States and United Kingdom on eating disorder inpatients. Studies researching both UK and US mental health patients are sparse therefore this study provides novel data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cliffe et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Eating disorders (n=1,546). Above average suicidality detected via NLP vs. Average or below average suicidality was evaluated on Non-eating disorder-related psychiatric readmission within 2 years post-discharge (OR 3.48, 95% CI 2.03-5.99, p=<.001). Above average suicidality detected via NLP during admission increased the risk of non-eating disorder psychiatric readmission in the US cohort (OR 3.48; P<.001) but not the UK cohort (OR 1.34; P=.32).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: