The reflectance ratio of the middle-infrared band (MIR, 1.55-1.75 μm) to the near-infrared band (NIR, 0.76-0.90 mm) is linearly related to the log10 equivalent water thickness (EWT) for single leaves of different morphologies, whereas the MIR/NIR radiance ratio is correlated with the leaf area index (LAI). The hypothesis that the MIR/NIR ratio measures canopy EWT was tested by reanalysing airborne Thematic Mapper Simulator and field data obtained across a large gradient of LAI in western Oregon, U.S.A. The measured airborne MIR/NIR reflectance ratios for canopies were not significantly different from the predicted ratios using leaf data for canopy EWT, except for two desert woodland sites. The interpretation of the MIR/NIR ratio is scale-dependent, because leaf EWT is determined by physiology, whereas canopy EWT is determined primarily by variations in LAI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
E. Raymond Hunt (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: