Key result
Endovascular recanalization in CLTI is linked to a ~0.6-second faster foot contrast arrival time.
Why the study?
Two-dimensional perfusion angiography is a new method to quantify and evaluate tissue perfusion, but evaluation of contrast arrival and distribution dynamics before and after endovascular intervention in critical limb threatening ischemia was needed.
Does 2D perfusion angiography detect quantitative changes in foot contrast arrival and perfusion dynamics after endovascular recanalization in patients with critical limb threatening ischemia?
Observational (n=33)
Non-randomised
No
Does 2D perfusion angiography detect quantitative changes in foot contrast arrival and perfusion dynamics after endovascular recanalization in patients with critical limb threatening ischemia?
2D perfusion angiography using diluted contrast injected via a standard groin introducer feasibly quantifies improvements in pedal contrast arrival and wash-in dynamics immediately after endovascular CLTI intervention without requiring extra contrast or selective catheterization.
2D perfusion angiography detects immediate perfusion gains after CLTI recanalization; supports feasibility but leaves open clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: Two-dimensional perfusion angiography is a new method to quantify and evaluate tissue perfusion during endovascular intervention. The aim was to evaluate time-patterns and dynamics of contrast arrival and distribution before and after endovascular intervention in patients with critical limb threatening ischemia. METHODS: Data were collected from 37 patients with critical limb threatening ischemia due to infra-inguinal occlusive disease having a successful endovascular procedure. two-dimensional perfusion angiography was used as a post-processing software with analysis of numeric parameters related to arrival and distribution patterns of contrast. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were successfully analysed whereas four patients were excluded due to motion artefacts. All patients were successfully treated with recanalization of the superficial femoral, popliteal, below the knee-vessels or a combination. Short-term improvement at 30-day follow-up was noted both clinically and by ankle-brachial index and toe pressure measurements. A significant reduction in contrast arrival time between pre-and post-angioplasty runs was noted as measured by arrival time median 3.2 and interquartile range (2.5-4.2) vs. 2.6 (1.6-3.4) and time-to-peak 4.1 (3.6-5.0) vs. 3.1 (2.3-3.9) p = 0.009. An increased wash-in rate was also observed 18.3 (12.6-21) vs. 30.1 (22-30.5) p = 0.001 between pre-and post-angioplasty runs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of perfusion angiography for evaluation of foot-circulation during endovascular interventions provides new information regarding quantitative assessment of contrast inflow before and after endovascular intervention without the need for extra contrast or runs. No selective catheterisation is necessary. The technique is easily adopted in a clinical setting. Further studies are necessary to create robust clinical endpoints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pärsson et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) due to infra-inguinal occlusive disease (n=33). Two-dimensional perfusion angiography before and after endovascular recanalization (PTA +/- stenting) vs. Pre-angioplasty baseline 2D perfusion angiography run (paired within-patient comparison) was evaluated on Change in 2D perfusion angiography contrast arrival time (AT, seconds) between pre- and post-angioplasty runs (p=0.007). Endovascular recanalization significantly reduced 2D perfusion angiography contrast arrival time from median 3.2 s to 2.6 s (p=0.007) and time-to-peak from 4.1 s to 3.1 s (p=0.009) in CLTI patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: