Key result
Dual antiplatelet therapy did not significantly reduce the 5-year composite risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared to aspirin monotherapy in patients with diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease undergoing CABG (HR 1.06, p=0.86).
Why the study?
Does dual antiplatelet therapy reduce the 5-year composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or stroke compared to aspirin monotherapy in diabetics with stable ischemic heart disease undergoing CABG?
Cohort (n=378)
Nonrandomized
Yes
Does dual antiplatelet therapy reduce the 5-year composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or stroke compared to aspirin monotherapy in diabetics with stable ischemic heart disease undergoing CABG?
In patients with diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease undergoing CABG, dual antiplatelet therapy was not associated with improved 5-year cardiovascular outcomes compared to aspirin monotherapy.
Does not support DAPT over aspirin post-CABG in diabetics; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice pending RCTs.
Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing CABG is recommended to prevent recurrent ischemic events. The benefit of DAPT post-CABG in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utilization rate of DAPT and associated outcomes in patients with SIHD undergoing CABG via a secondary analysis of Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial data. Methods: In a post-hoc, nonrandomized analysis from the BARI 2D trial, we compared patients receiving DAPT and aspirin monotherapy within 90 days post-randomization. The primary outcome was the risk adjusted 5-year composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. We analyzed patients assigned to prompt CABG treatment arm including both the insulin therapy assignments. Results: Of 378 patients, within 90 days post-randomization, 59 (16%) patients received DAPT and 319 (84%) patients received aspirin alone. Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the 5-year composite event of death, MI, and stroke between DAPT and monotherapy cohorts [13 (22.0%) vs. 61 (19.1%); adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56 to 2.00; P=0.86]. There also was no significant difference at 1 year in the composite event [6 (10.2%) vs. 30 (9.4%); HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.79; P=0.79]. Conclusions: The use of DAPT in patients with diabetes post-CABG in this cohort was low. Compared with aspirin monotherapy, no associated differences were observed in cardiovascular outcomes. Larger prospective studies are needed to further elucidate this observation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mori et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease (n=378). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs. Aspirin monotherapy was evaluated on 5-year composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.56-2.00, p=0.86). Dual antiplatelet therapy did not significantly reduce the 5-year composite risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared to aspirin monotherapy in patients with diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease undergoing CABG (HR 1.06, p=0.86).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: